The Fact About h4831sc load data That No One Is Suggesting
The Fact About h4831sc load data That No One Is Suggesting
Blog Article
Your session is going to timeout on account of inactivity. Click Okay to extend your time and effort for yet another 0 minutes.
Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the precise copy of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or limited Slice. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels enable the powder to circulation in the powder actions more efficiently, assisting to alleviate the frequent cutting of granules.
The fact that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is specifically why you're looking at larger velocities received with that powder, versus That which you've viewed With all the IMR things. Also very good powder, but fairly far better suited to a little bit scaled-down circumstances that has a little bit fewer ability.
Minnesota H4831SC is my visit in the 7mm Rem Mag, but I'm conserving the very little I've remaining for tumble 2021. I'd begin reduced and operate your way up, based upon what load data you take a look at for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.
Beginner to reloading. This will likely be used for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be ready to get my arms on a few lbs of h4831.
Liberalism; The impossible but approved Idea that it's entirely achievable to pick up a turd through the clear conclusion.
I'm using it with a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. RL22 did perfectly but I was a little worried about h4831sc temp steadiness. I feel I am at 72 grains and have about 2850ish fps
and you might want to spend money on some new load data textbooks. powder composition and chemistry can does adjust through the years. 4831 powder of many years back just isn't very same as what exactly is available. which is why an individual seriously interested in reloading safely and securely can have quite possibly the most present-day load data textbooks to make reference to.
WA I'd personally propose a slower burner that h4831 vs h4831sc could give greater situation density like H1000 or IMR 7977, especially if you are loading heavies extended.
The 55grs is all that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that h4831sc load data they've got slowed down the swift to indicate that their rifles are superior. It bug the hell out of me. I understand greater. This is why I do not at any time toss out my older manuals. I do invest in new manual all the time to stay up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ 100+ degrees without any issues.
As for your 4831 vs 4831SC, They may be precisely the same/similar powder cept for grain measurement. Load data is interchangeable.
I exploit 52 grs H4831sc with a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It can be exact, gentle mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it absolutely was me, I might begin at fifty two gr and perform up.
Both of those provide the Exact burn off price, short Slice comes in helpful Should you be at max fill and never at tension/velocity you want you will get a lot more shortcut within a circumstance.
If I've a pound or two of the powder and get more of precisely the same, only a different large amount amount, I'll mix them all up to make sure that I have a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.